As I prepare to attend the International Association of Facilitators Conference in Denver (one of my favorite professional conferences!) I remember presenting at this same conference (but in Europe a couple of years ago) on the topic of Facilitation as a Key Intervention for Organizational Change.
The SmartChange™ Blog
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt Part VI: The Change Agent
This is part of the series The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt. The concepts and ideas presented also apply to other improvement professionals and leaders implementing improvements in an organization.
The Change Agent Role
Once I was working with a plant manager in Latin America to facilitate an all day session to roll out a new operating plan from the plant. We had planned a very interactive day to ensure the start to this transition would be effective. When I got there I found out that the two ‘big guns’ from corporate who were architects of the plan were in town and prepared to take over the meeting to present the business case and laying out the plan, the new operating goals, the financials, and the new roles and responsibilities, all in good Six Sigma lingo. The HR manager was there with stacks of paper containing the new job descriptions. It was obviously too late for me to change course so I sat in the audience as an observer.
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt Part V: The Facilitator
This is part of the series The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt. The concepts and ideas presented also apply to other improvement professionals and leaders implementing improvements in an organization.
The Facilitator Role
To illustrate this role picture this. I was with a team of IT programmers to develop a SIPOC (a tool that identifies the inputs, outputs, suppliers, and customers for each step of a process) of the testing process for new software. So, I asked a very straight forward and logical question…”what are the process steps for testing new software?”
I was surprised when the group seemed stumped. It’s not that they didn’t know the answer. They were subject matter experts. They knew how to test software. So I asked the same question again. Twice. With the same response…none!
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt Part IV: The Leader
This is part of the series The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt. The concepts and ideas presented also apply to other improvement professionals and leaders implementing improvements in an organization.
The Leader Role
This example illustrates this critical role. In one project I followed closely, the BB worked hard to earn the trust and respect of a team of front line workers who made electrical harnesses for aircraft. These were union employees who typically did not mingle with “management” types like a BB (even though BBs didn’t really didn’t manage people but that was the generic label for anyone not covered by a union contract), but they had managed to learn from one another and now they were developing a new training program as a pilot for a larger training effort within the union-covered workforce. The union employees even got to go on a “benchmarking” trip to a local company as part of the effort. It was unheard of for union employees to be involved in such activities but they loved the work and when faced with the expected criticism from fellow union members for hanging out with “management” people, they effectively defended their position and continued their work. This small band of unlikely friends (that’s what they had become) had bonded in such a way that even years after the BB had moved on to another division, they kept in touch and he would come by their shop whenever he was in town.
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt Part III: The Project Manager
This is part of the series The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt. The concepts and ideas presented also apply to other improvement professionals and leaders implementing improvements in an organization.
The Project Manager Role
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt Part II: The Expert
This is part of the series The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt. The concepts and ideas presented also apply to other improvement professionals and leaders implementing improvements in an organization.
The Expert Role
Companies that are serious about their Six Sigma initiative spend significant resources in training and certifying BBs (typically a two-year process). Thus, Black Belts become tool experts in using the technical tools of the Six Sigma methodologies (DMAIC or DFSS). They might also be subject matter experts (SME) if they are assigned projects within their own functional group. Finally, they may also be process experts as they are often selected because of their background as engineers, manufacturing professionals, or some other process focused discipline.
The Role of the Six Sigma Black Belt
The title of this series refers to the Six Sigma Black Belt, but the concepts and ideas expressed here apply equally to any improvement professional and leader trying to implement improvements in an organization.
Part I: The Question
Early in my career I had the chance to become trained and certified as a Six Sigma Black Belt (a trained practitioner of process and quantitative tools to improve process performance by practically eliminating errors and variation in a process). The company had fully embraced Six Sigma and selected a number of individuals to participate in a two-year rotation program to become certified Black Belts.
Black Belts were a “selected” group of experts “deployed” to save the company (ok, that’s a bit dramatic). Needless to say, the whole movement was not without controversy and though the company did achieve good success there were lessons to be learned.
Dealing with unwelcome change: Illinois town takes care of itself
Here is an interesting article in the USA Today about an IL town that dealt with unwelcome change in what appears to be an effective way.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-09-21-1Aherrin21_CV_N.htm
While many of the comments in response to the article focus on the practice of outsourcing, the main point of the article (and maybe I’m filtering through my own lenses too much) is how the town coped with the transition. It’s a good story, even inspiring. It does not have a happy ending for all but overall, I think it’s a good example of managing through a very difficult transition. I encourage you to read the article but here is what I gleaned as far as effective change/transition management practices:
The Effects of Organizational Change on Psychological Stress and Job Performance
Last year (March 2008) the Journal of International Business & Economicspublished a study by Phapruke Ussahawanitchakit and Chaiyot Sumritsakun on the effect of Organizational Change (OC) on employees’ stress and performance. Among other findings, they reported:
- OC results in higher psychological stress (employees feeling psychologically and emotionally drained due to pressure during the organizational change).
- OC leads to lower job performance due to stress.
- Moreover, neither “organizational communication and support moderate the relationships” between organizational change, psychological stress, and job performance.
Best and Worst Practices in BPM and SOA
In his article, author Peter Woodhull presents the following 3 worst practices and 3 best practices to implementing BPM (Business Process Management) and SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture):
- Buying software first without understanding the business needs and requirements.
- Discounting the organizational change effort required to make the solution work.
- Trying to “boil” the ocean, trying to do all at once.
Best
- Start by defining and validating the problem and the business process in question.
- Use BPM and SOA as part of the solution instead of THE solution to complex business problems.
- Start with a mission critical process to ensure the necessary executive sponsorship and priority.
